Banking profitability and implications of shifts in payments landscape 

In today’s blog post, I repost my Business Day article in which I discuss what the shifting payments landscape means for banks’ profits.

Banking profitability and implications of shifts in payments landscape 

Daan Steenkamp

South Africa’s major banks stand out globally among large banks for their extraordinary profitability. A common measure of profitability is return on equity. The sector’s return on equity is high by international standards: it has averaged around 15% since 2011, higher than in other concentrated banking systems such as Australia or New Zealand (both around 12%).

Why are South African banks so profitable? Our modelling suggests that the best explanatory factors for South African banking return on equity over the long term has been developments in credit impairments, costs relative to income and the credit cycle. Over recent years, banking return on equity has been buoyed by improved capital positions and elevated real interest rates. An interesting feature of the South African banking system is that South African banks are highly dependent on deposits as a form of bank funding and the relative cost of raising deposit funding compared to other forms of funding has historically been low. Banks’ interest income rises when policy rates rise, while deposit rates in South Africa have been sluggish to adjust to higher interest rates. This has helped to raise banks’ net interest income during periods of higher policy rates.

Bank profitability is a function of interest income, non-interest income, and a bank’s cost structure. Shifts in the payment landscape are putting banks’ non-interest income under pressure. The use of cash, for example, has not been growing to the same extent as other forms of payment. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, cash in circulation has not kept up with growth in consumer prices in South Africa. Banks’ average fees from transactions have also been on decline. Again, relative to inflation, average revenue from payments for the industry is down 50% since 2016. There is increasing regulatory and market pressure on banks to reduce interchange fees, led by innovations such as real-time payments clearing and PayShap.

However, the displacement of cash by other digital streams does present an opportunity for South African banks. South African GDP is becoming more bank transaction intensive, with the number of banking transactions rising strongly even though the value of transactions have not increased to the same extent. South Africa ranks above countries like Turkey, Mexico, and India in terms of the intensity of cashless payments in GDP, according to the latest Bank of International Settlements estimates. There is therefore an opportunity for banks to grow their revenue streams despite lower average payment fees. Growing their client bases would also present an opportunity for banks to leverage their client data to better understand what developments in the economy mean for specific market segments and how they could better serve their clients.

Looking ahead, the prospect of interest rate cuts by the Reserve Bank will put pressure on banks’ net interest income. ‘Basel’ regulatory reforms that bear on banks have also increased banks’ funding costs by increasing the relative cost of deposit funding and the duration of bank borrowing.

On the other hand, banks have an opportunity to reduce their cost structures and sweat their capital harder. South Africa’s large banks have a very strong capital position for new investment. But South African banks lag on investment in new technologies. Automation, for example, offers banks an opportunity to reduce their costs through streamlining of things like their compliance and reporting processes. Over recent years, banks have faced significant cost pressures from staff expenses (which represent over 50% of operating expenses) and technology costs (with computer processing representing a further 15%).

Embracing automation and digitally efficient architecture will be crucial to reducing bank operating expenses and enhancing the efficiency of service provision in South African banking. Real-time payments and modernization of the payment system promises to reduce system overhead and reduce the amount of time bank cash is tied up, speeding up the deployment of funds to investments and loans. This also offers banks the opportunity to partner with fintech companies to offer value-added services to their customers, such as digital wallets or mobile payment platforms to broaden their customer base. Predictive analytics can help banks better understand emerging market trends, inform asset allocation decisions and liquidity management. Banks can also do a lot more to harness their data to better tailor their offerings to customers and use customer insights to target their value-added services to clients. Such services are already growing rapidly. Electrum’s estimates and other sources suggest that banking value-added services market volumes have grown 40% in South Africa since 2021.

Regulations and shifts in payments landscape are changing the drivers of bank profitability in South Africa. While the ongoing decline in interchange fees will be a boon for consumers, bank revenues will be under increasing pressure. By adopting modern payment systems and investing in automation, banks can scale their payment systems and develop new revenue streams, realise cost efficiencies, and exploit data analytics to improve their asset utilization and raise the returns on their investments.

Dr Steenkamp is CEO of Codera Analytics and a research fellow with the economics department at Stellenbosch University.

Codera Blog Newsletter

Sign up to receive a weekly summary of our blog posts

Check your inbox for a confirmation email

Verified by MonsterInsights